Top Legislation - View All
Latest Action: 01/05/2007 - Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Bill TextExpressing that Congress has the sole and exclusive power to declare war. 1/5/2007--Introduced. States that pursuant to section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United States, Congress has the sole and exclusive power to declare war.
Latest Action: 09/04/2007 - Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Lieberman without amendment and with a preamble. Without written report. Bill TextA resolution reaffirming the constitutional and statutory protections accorded sealed domestic mail, and for other purposes. 9/4/2007--Reported to Senate without amendment. (There is 1 other summary) (This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Reaffirms the constitutional and statutory protections accorded sealed domestic mail.
Also tagged in: Church and state, Civil liberties, Constitution, Education, Elementary and secondary education, Government information, Public meetings, Religion, Religion in the public schools, Religious liberty, School boards
Latest Action: 01/22/2007 - Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text of measure as introduced: CR S852) Bill TextA resolution expressing support for prayer at school board meetings. 1/22/2007--Introduced. Recognizes that prayer before school board meetings is a protected act and expresses support for such prayer.
Also tagged in: Armed forces, Congress, Congress and foreign policy, Congress and military policy, Constitution, Defense policy, Foreign policy, Iraq compilation, President and foreign policy, Presidents, War and emergency powers
Latest Action: 02/14/2007 - Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Bill TextUrging the collective judgment of both Congress and the President regarding the use of military force by the United States. 2/14/2007--Introduced. Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the Constitution provides that the President may act to defend the country in an emergency, but reserved the matter of offensive war to Congress. Affirms the constitutional requirement that the President seek and obtain the approval of Congress before the United States undertakes offensive military action against another nation.
Also tagged in: Actions and defenses, Congress, Congressional employees, Congressional legal counsel, Congressional office operations, Congressional privileges and immunities, Constitution, Ex-Members of Congress, Government employees, Law, Members of Congress, Senate
Latest Action: 03/23/2007 - Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3724; text as passed: CR S3724; text of measure as introduced: CR S3718) Bill TextA resolution to direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the name of the Senate in support of the appellee in Office of Senator Mark Dayton v. Brad Hanson. 3/23/2007--Passed Senate without amendment. (There is 1 other summary) (This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Directs the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae on behalf of the Senate in support of Appellee Brad Hanson in Office of Senator Mark Dayton v. Brad Hanson, to protect the Senate's interest in the proper application of the Speech or Debate Clause to civil actions brought under the Congressional Accountability Act.
Also tagged in: Campaign funds, Civil liberties, Constitution, Corruption in politics, Elections, Freedom of association, Freedom of speech, Government ethics, Law, Politics and government, Public corruption, Supreme Court, Supreme Court decisions
Latest Action: 10/04/2007 - Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H11302) Bill TextExpressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo. 1/4/2007--Introduced. Expresses the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. Valeo because the decision failed to recognize: (1) that the unlimited spending of large amounts of money on elections has a corrosive effect on the electoral process not simply because of direct transactions between those who give large amounts of money and candidates and elected officials but because the presence of unlimited amounts of money corrupts the process on a more fundamental level; and (2) other legitimate state interests which justify limiting money in campaigns, including the need to preserve the integrity of our republican form of government, restore public confidence in government, and ensure all citizens a more equal opportunity to participate in the political [...] show full description
Also tagged in: Armed forces, Congress, Congress and foreign policy, Congress and military policy, Congressional powers, Congressional-executive relations, Constitution, Declaration of war, Defense policy, Foreign policy, President and foreign policy, President as Commander-in-Chief, Presidents, War and emergency powers
Latest Action: 01/24/2007 - Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1074-1075) Bill TextA resolution expressing the sense of the Senate on the need for approval by the Congress before any offensive military action by the United States against another nation. 1/24/2007--Introduced. Expresses the sense of the Senate that: (1) under the Constitution it is Congress that has the power to take the country from a state of peace to a state of war; (2) the framers of the Constitution understood that the President may act to defend the country and repel sudden attack but reserved the matter of offensive war to the Congress as the representatives of the people; (3) the Senate affirms the requirement under the Constitution that the President seek congressional approval before the United States undertakes offensive military action against another nation; (4) consultation by the President with the Congress on any U.S. undertaking of offensive military action against another nation must allow for full congressional debate; and (5) any offensive military action by the United [...] show full description
Latest Action: 05/03/2007 - Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. Bill TextExpressing the sense of the House of Representatives that judicial determinations regarding the meaning of the Constitution of the United States should not be based on judgments, laws, or pronouncements of foreign institutions unless such foreign judgments, laws, or pronouncements inform an understanding of the original meaning of the Constitution of the United States. 5/3/2007--Introduced. Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that judicial interpretations of the U.S. Constitution should not be based on judgments, laws, or pronouncements of foreign institutions unless such judgments, laws, or pronouncements inform an understanding of the original meaning of the Constitution.
Also tagged in: Accounting, Actions and defenses, Campaign funds, Congress, Congressional elections, Constitution, Election candidates, Elections, Finance, Fund raising, Government information, Government paperwork, Injunctions, Judicial review, Law, Members of Congress, Parties to actions, Political action committees, Political advertising, Political parties, Politics and government, Presidential elections, Presidents, Voter registration, Voting
Latest Action: 01/11/2007 - Referred to the House Committee on House Administration. Bill TextTo amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to clarify when organizations described in section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 must register as political committees, and for other purposes. 1/11/2007--Introduced. 527 Reform Act of 2007 - Amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to subject to its requirements as a political committee any applicable 527 organization. Excludes from the meaning of 527 organization for these purposes any committee, club, association, or other group of persons organized to influence: (1) the selection, nomination, election, appointment, or confirmation of one or more candidates to non-federal or non-elected office; or (2) any state or local ballot measure. Denies exception from treatment as an applicable 527 organization to any such a committee, club, association, or other groups of persons which makes disbursements aggregating more than $1,000 for: (1) a public communication that promotes, supports, attacks,[...] show full description
Also tagged in: Accounting, Actions and defenses, Campaign funds, Congress, Congressional elections, Constitution, Election candidates, Elections, Finance, Fund raising, Government information, Government paperwork, Injunctions, Judicial review, Law, Members of Congress, Parties to actions, Political action committees, Political advertising, Political parties, Politics and government, Presidential elections, Presidents, Voter registration, Voting
Latest Action: 01/31/2007 - Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1440-1441) Bill TextA bill to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to clarify when organizations described in section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 must register as political committees, and for other purposes. 1/31/2007--Introduced. 527 Reform Act of 2007 - Amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to subject to its requirements as a political committee any applicable 527 organization.Excludes from the meaning of 527 organization for these purposes any committee, club, association, or other group of persons organized to influence: (1) the selection, nomination, election, appointment, or confirmation of one or more candidates to non-federal or non-elected office; or (2) any state or local ballot measure.Denies exception from treatment as an applicable 527 organization to any such a committee, club, association, or other groups of persons which makes disbursements aggregating more than $1,000 for: (1) a public communication that promotes, supports, attacks,[...] show full description
|
Latest Legislation - View All
Also tagged in: Armed forces, Armed forces abroad, Budgets, Congress, Congress and foreign policy, Congress and military policy, Congressional oversight, Constitution, Defense budgets, Defense economics, Defense policy, Foreign policy, International affairs, Iraq, Iraq compilation, Law, Middle East and North Africa, Military agreements, Negotiations, President and foreign policy, Presidents, Treaty-making power, United Nations
Latest Action: 08/01/2008 - Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S8040) Bill TextA bill to ensure that any agreement with Iraq containing a security commitment or arrangement is concluded as a treaty or is approved by Congress. 8/1/2008--Introduced. Iraq Security Agreement Act of 2008 - Directs the President to report annually to the appropriate congressional committees respecting U.S. security commitments to, and arrangements with, other countries. Directs the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense to consult with the appropriate congressional committees respecting negotiations pursuant to the Declaration of Principles between the United States and Iraq. Prohibits any agreement (or the obligation of implementing funds) containing a security commitment to, or security arrangement with, the Republic of Iraq, from entering into force except pursuant to Article II, section 2, clause 2 (relating to treaties) or Article I, section 7, clause 2 (relating to enactment of laws) of the Constitution of the United States.
Latest Action: 06/19/2008 - Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. Bill TextA bill to require Congress to specify the source of authority under the United States Constitution for the enactment of laws, and for other purposes. 6/19/2008--Introduced. Enumerated Powers Act - Requires each Act of Congress to contain a concise and definite statement of the constitutional authority relied upon for the enactment of each portion of that Act. Declares that failure to comply with this requirement shall give rise to a point of order in either chamber of Congress.
Also tagged in: Appellate courts, California, Commemorations, Congressional tributes, Constitution, Education, Elementary and secondary education, Elementary education, Families, Home schooling, Judicial opinions, Law, Licenses, Parent and child, Secondary education, Supreme Court decisions, Teachers
Latest Action: 05/21/2008 - Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S4626) Bill TextA resolution calling upon the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District of California to uphold the fundamental and constitutional right of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children. 5/21/2008--Introduced. Commends the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District in Los Angeles, California, for allowing a rehearing of the decision in the In re Rachel L. case, requiring parents to hold a teaching license in order to legally homeschool their children. Calls upon the court to uphold the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion that parents have a fundamental and constitutional right to direct the upbringing and education of their children.
Also tagged in: Appellate courts, California, Commemorations, Congressional tributes, Constitution, Education, Elementary and secondary education, Elementary education, Families, Home schooling, Judicial opinions, Law, Licenses, Parent and child, Secondary education, Supreme Court decisions, Teachers
Latest Action: 06/03/2008 - Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property. Bill TextCalling upon the courts to uphold the fundamental and constitutional right of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children. 4/3/2008--Introduced. Commends the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District in Los Angeles, California, for allowing a rehearing of the decision in the In re Rachel L. case, requiring parents to hold a teaching license in order to legally homeschool their children. Calls upon the court to uphold the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion that parents have a fundamental and constitutional right to direct the upbringing and education of their children.
Also tagged in: Armed forces, Citizenship, Constitution, Defense policy, Elections, Families, Immigration, Military dependents, Naturalization, Politics and government, Presidential elections, Presidents
Latest Action: 02/28/2008 - Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. Bill TextA bill to clarify the law and ensure that children born to United States citizens while serving overseas in the military are eligible to become President. 2/28/2008--Introduced. Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act - Declares that the term "natural born Citizen" in article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution, dealing with the criteria for election to President of the United States, includes any person born to any U.S. citizen while serving in the active or reserve components of the U.S. armed forces.
Also tagged in: Civil liberties, Constitution, Criminal justice, Freedom of speech, Jurisdiction, Law, Pornography, State and local government, State courts, State laws, Supreme Court
Latest Action: 03/17/2008 - Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property. Bill TextTo amend title 28, United States Code, to limit Federal court jurisdiction over State laws restricting pornography, and for other purposes. 2/28/2008--Introduced. The Pornography Jurisdiction Limitation Act of 2008 - Amends the federal judicial code to provide that no court created by Act of Congress shall have jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court shall have no appellate jurisdiction, to hear or decide a question of whether a state pornography law imposes a constitutionally invalid restriction on the freedom of expression. Provides that a decision of a federal court, to the extent the decision relates to such a question, is not binding precedent on a state court.
Latest Action: 02/25/2008 - Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1145; text as passed Senate: CR S1145; text of measure as introduced: CR S1144) Bill TextA resolution to authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of National Association of Manufacturers v. Taylor, et al. 2/25/2008--Passed Senate without amendment. (There is 1 other summary) (This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Authorizes the Senate Legal Counsel to represent the Secretary of the Senate in the case of National Association of Manufacturers v. Taylor, et al.
Also tagged in: Armed forces, Budgets, Congress, Congress and foreign policy, Congress and military policy, Congressional oversight, Congressional-executive relations, Constitution, Defense budgets, Defense economics, Defense policy, Executive departments, Foreign policy, International affairs, Iraq, Iraq compilation, Middle East and North Africa, Military agreements, President and foreign policy, Presidential powers, Presidents, Treaty-making power
Latest Action: 12/06/2007 - Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. Bill TextA bill to provide for congressional oversight of United States agreements with the Government of Iraq. 12/6/2007--Introduced. Congressional Oversight of Iraq Agreements Act of 2007 - Directs the Legal Advisor to the Secretary of State to provide Congress with the justification (including the constitutional authority) for the President's decision to deny Congress its constitutionally protected role by concluding an agreement on the future of the security relationship between the United States and Iraq as an executive agreement. Expresses the sense of Congress that any bilateral agreement between the United States and Iraq involving "commitments or risks affecting the nation as a whole," including a status of forces agreement (SOFA), that is not a treaty approved by two-thirds of the Senate under Article II of the Constitution or authorized by legislation does not have the force of law. Prohibits the use of funds to carry out such an agreement.
Latest Action: 02/25/2008 - Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties. Bill TextTo establish the William H. Rehnquist Center on the Constitutional Structures of Government at the University of Arizona James E. Rogers School of Law. 11/15/2007--Introduced. William H. Rehnquist Law Center Establishment Act of 2007 - Authorizes the Attorney General to provide a grant to the University of Arizona James E. Rogers School of Law to establish the William H. Rehnquist Center on the Constitutional Structures of Government. Requires the Law School to provide specified nonfederal contributions toward the establishment of the Law Center.
Also tagged in: Actions and defenses, Anarchism, Armed forces, Citizenship, Communications, Congress and foreign policy, Congress and military policy, Congressional oversight, Congressional-executive relations, Constitution, Courts-martial and courts of inquiry, Criminal justice, Criminal procedure, Defense policy, Detention of persons, Due process of law, Electronic surveillance, Evidence (Law), Executive departments, Fines (Penalties), Foreign policy, Habeas corpus, Imprisonment, Information leaking, Injunctions, Intelligence activities, International affairs, Journalism, Kidnapping, Law, National security, Parties to actions, Police questioning, Politics and government, President and foreign policy, Presidents, Prosecution, Reporters and reporting, Rule of law, Terrorism, Torture, War and emergency powers, War crimes, Warrants (Law)
Latest Action: 11/02/2007 - Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties. Bill TextTo restore the Constitution's checks and balances and protections against government abuses as envisioned by the Founding Fathers. 10/15/2007--Introduced. American Freedom Agenda Act of 2007 - Repeals the Military Commissions Act of 2006. Authorizes the President to establish military commissions for the trial of war crimes only in places of active hostilities against the United States where an immediate trial is necessary to preserve fresh evidence or to prevent local anarchy. Prohibits the President from detaining any individual indefinitely as an unlawful enemy combatant absent proof by substantial evidence that the individual has directly engaged in active hostilities against the United States. Prohibits the detention of any U.S. citizen as an unlawful enemy combatant. Entitles any individual detained as an enemy combatant by the United States to petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Prohibits any civilian or military tribunal of the United [...] show full description
|