AB2062 - California

Follow

Firearms, Gangs  
0 No HTML. Comments are subject to approval. Minimum 50 characters.
  • anonymous said

    All I have to say is wow. With all the financial trouble that faces the once great state of California it just amazes me that our politicians can still find useless programs to spend our tax money on. If anyone had any doubts before, this proves that CA politicians are declaring war on law abiding citizens. Does anyone really believe that this will stop criminals? Way to go guys. Thanks for trying to find another way to step on the law abiding citizens rights ! Well done Comrade
    06/22/2009
  • In committee: Set, first hearing. Held under submission.
    08/07/2008
  • In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
    08/04/2008
  • From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR. In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
    08/04/2008
  • John M. Culver said

    As a life long democrat and 14 year high school math teacher and fatherof three kids, who want to go target shooting and hunting, I can only say that your bill seems to have no other purpose than to hurt people like me. The republicans who have the money won't be financially affected by your bill and the gang thugs will ALWAYS be able to get their weapons illegally. If your bill passes my own kids will only be able to practice 16 to 18 shoots per month which is ridiculous in terms of practice. The $3.00 tax per box is also another slap to us low income people. I am not sure if you actually mean't for these unreasonable effects to occur, but if you did then it would be quite disturbing and not speak well of you as a person. I can only hope that the Senate doesn't pass this working class unfriendly bill. If it does then your credentials as a working class person's friend will have to be revised negatively. John Culver Fresno, California
    07/11/2008
  • Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    06/25/2008
  • From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) .
    06/24/2008
  • Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
    06/12/2008
  • In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
    06/02/2008
  • Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 42. Noes 32. Page 5582.)
    05/29/2008
  • Read second time. To third reading.
    05/27/2008
  • From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (May 22). Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
    05/23/2008
  • In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
    05/14/2008
  • Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    05/06/2008
  • From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
    05/05/2008
  • Rules Committee ruled on a point of order referred by the Committee on Public Safety to determine whether AB 2062 De Leon was substantially similar to AB 362 De Leon. The Rules Committee ruled that the point of order was not well taken.
    04/10/2008
  • From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 8).
    04/09/2008
  • Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
    04/03/2008
  • From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
    04/02/2008
  • In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
    03/25/2008
Alternative Formats RSS ATOM JSON
California
Last Update
10/11/2009
Share This Page